Do Vaccines Cause Autism? It Doesn’t Matter. Vaccinate Anyway.

Vaccines have been on the news a lot lately, primarily because people don’t want to be giving their children shots that would result in a neurological disorder (like autism) or something else. Now, while I regard this position as ultimately unsound and not informed on the scientific issue of vaccines as a whole, I believe that even if we grant this fundamental premise of the anti-vax crowd, there is still a very good reason to be pro-vaccine.

Put simply, even if vaccines did cause autism, it would still be irresponsible for parents to not vaccinate their children.

vacine_poison123Vaccines are great at doing what they were intended to do. Namely, prevent certain diseases. It is virtually impossible to deny that the vaccines do their job. Unless, of course, you think that the scientific community is some kind of conspiracy organization, then you can deny it all you want. But you’d be wrong about vaccines and vaccines would still work.

Throw a conspiracy theory at something and you can deny or embrace anything, including decades of research.
And the moon landing.
Tell you what. If you’re a fan of conspiracy theories, I suggest you take a little time out of your day to study epistemology. Start here, on my blog! ❤

For a great visual (and potty-mouthed) presentation of what would happen to a population without vaccines, Penn & Teller made this video and you should watch it.

Remember, we are assuming that vaccines prevent diseases and that these same vaccines also cause autism in a small number of vaccine recipients.

Imagine a world where everyone is vaccinated.

In this world, preventable diseases are not a major problem. However, a small number of people have autism caused by vaccines (or some other cause).

Now imagine a world where no one was vaccinated.

In this world, preventable diseases kill hundreds (likely thousands) of people every year, and still a small number of people have autism (because vaccines are not the only potential cause of autism, even the anti-vaxers recognize this).

Clearly the world where we don’t have thousands of deaths from preventable diseases is the correct choice. There’s a darn good reason to vaccinate your kids.

I know what you’re saying.
“False dichotomy! There’s a middle ground there!”
Ok, you’re right.

Imagine that middle-ground world. The world where people choose between vaccination or a potentially autistic child.
So… the actual world.

In this world, we should still vaccinate, because if they don’t, their child may die from a deadly, preventable disease. And if they do, their child may have autism. I don’t know about you, but I’d rather have a child with a neurological disorder than a dead one who died of a preventable disease because I chose not to vaccinate.

Here’s the real clincher in this middle-ground scenario.

Some kids CAN’T be vaccinated for medical reasons. They’re either too young, have compromised immune systems or have other complications. The parents of these children are not even given the autism-or-deadly disease choice that other parents are.

If the unvaccinated kids live in a population where other kids are not vaccinated, preventable diseases present a real threat to their health and lives. But if they live in a community where everyone else is vaccinated, then the threat is significantly reduced because people around them don’t have the disease.

My ‘meta’ problem that I have with the anti-vax crowd is this.

They’d rather put hundreds (maybe thousands) of children in a life-threatening situation by allowing mumps, pneumonia, measles, diphtheria and many other diseases to be reintroduced into the community instead of having to potentially raise a child with a neurological disorder. They’d rather take the (increasingly likely, unfortunately) chance of their child coming down with a preventable illness (that may result in the child’s death) instead of the minuscule chance that they might have to raise an autistic child.

This is either severe ignorance or selfishness.
I’m not entirely sure which one it is.
I’m hoping ignorance is to blame.

Do the research.
Don’t spread misinformation.
Vaccinate your kids.

If you’re interested in the correlation between vaccines and autism, click here. I usually don’t like these infographic-type images, but this one is done remarkably well.

Thanks for reading.

* I am not trying to downplay the difficulties had by those with autism or families of those with someone with autism. I realize that it is difficult in many cases. I am also aware of several people on the spectrum who are extremely high functioning; in many situations, more skilled than those without autism.


  1. I think vaccines are necessary according to our way of life. We could develop our way of life to not need vaccines, or at least not so many and increasing by the generations. We evolve into our dependencies and if our bodies are not required to do something, it won’t do it anymore. It seems like people are very sensitive to everything these days and require an injection for every bad habit that they are unwilling to address and take responsibility for. We want fixes and we are not concerned about our mistakes that need fixing. Also, how could an unvaccinated person be a threat to a vaccinated person if vaccines work?

    1. Travis, I think that is possibly a bit of an oversimplification of the process of evolution.

      Our bodies, right now, are not able to fight the diseases for which vaccines are produced. If they were, some people would be naturally immune. If we let evolution take over, that would be to allow the diseases to kill everyone that is not immune, resulting in a totally immune population.

      But this entails us letting everyone die when we have the ability to prevent it, and that’s not something you’ll find very many people arguing for these days.

      I believe we are in agreement about the second part of your comment. I do think medication can be (and often is) unnecessarily prescribed as a solution to something that may not need medication.

      Lastly, I don’t believe I made the argument that a vaccinated person would be threatened by an unvaccinated person. My argument is that the unvaccinated are a threat to the other unvaccinated. And the problem here is that many people are unvaccinated because they cannot be vaccinated, for reasons listed in my post.
      So, the vaccinated would not be threatened by the unvaccinated.

      1. You’re perfectly ok with allowing (probably) hundreds of millions of people to die from preventable illnesses, because you’re hoping that the evolutionary process will make us naturally immune?

      2. I am aware of the process. I am far from perfectly OK with it. Nature is hurting from our numbers and our lifestyles. One process or another is inevitable or we will all be rubbing elbows on a dead planet. Or perhaps a great solution will arise? Population is being looked at as a huge problem and many bright individuals are working hard to solve it. It is hard to discuss things of that nature with the regular population, naturally. ; )

      3. So we do agree that a process is already in place, but we run into a choice of morals. It does get blurry when our intention to help only causes more problems. When we free the struggling hawk from the snake we feel as if we did something helpful but we did not. We only interfered in a perfect process that we could not see at first sight. I struggle to get it myself.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s